By doing this website my goal is to share informations but mainly the orphanage project.


I develop memology while travelling and realizing various objectives. For this reason I don’t have much time to correct every of my misspelling. If you are interessted by the subject and are really shocked by those mistakes, you are invited to send me corrections and comments. You are also invited to express every disagreement and experience related to memology.


Memology is a spiritual tool. Its first purpose is to give the opportunity to access to a spiritual and material awarness. As a result this tool gives the opportunity to understand your thought, your emotion, your being.
Full of habits and symbol instilled by our social, we often lose the sight of a dynamic reality. The capacity of being an actor of change depend on our awarness, conscience of our possibilities applied to the environment we evolve in. Memology allow to organize our thought, as well as structure our memory. It is a tool which give the possibility to realize our capacity to take our freedom of mind, of action. Its richness is its capacity of adaptation. It has been developed on the simple basis of our memory and thought properties. Resulting properties are therefore applicable to any thought process and memory use. As every of our science, everything we have developed is the produce of these ones, memology constitute the link to unificate them. Its second fonction is to link spiritual and material. With a process of logic it will allow to link physiology, cognitive science, psychology, philosophy and sociology. It can be applied to any science and has been developed to link them. The 1st and 2nd degrees below are only the system’s global presentation. The third degree will have more details and will contain its application.


First Degree

Our environment is in constant change, it has a dynamic. This dynamic imply actions, reactions and actors of this changement. Those actors are differenciate by particularities defining their identity. The dynamic of those particularities can be define as their evolution in space and time. Space and time constitute the structure supporting , organising those particularities, those identites.

Fig 1. Identities: field, green, down; sky, blue, high; butterfly, black, blue, yellow, round, straight, flight, etc…
The identities list, that is to say the list of the particularities shown by this schema could be long if we were searching to define it properly. For exemple the “sky” identity should be strenghten by the “air” identity which would be link to the “wind” identity, to the “oxygen”, tdo “azot”, etc…
Space: France, Lyon, Bagatelle, field, sky.
Time: 13 juin 2014 at 14h-14h01-14h02-14h03
Butterfly evolution in space and time: In France, in Lyon, at Field of Bagatelle, in the sky at 14h01 and at another place in the sky at 14h02.


We are particularities of this world and interact in its dynamic. Our dynamic as an actor is made possible by our material first scale of definition, our body. As an actor controlling our body, we are interacting with environment dynamics. Our conscience of this interaction is made possible by our senses relying its specificities and dynamics. Our experience create by the alliance of our senses and memory give us our own environment defintion. Our memory record our dynamic as an actor as well as the environment dynamics and its subjects and particularities. Our memory is composed by structures and identities.

To resume, our environment is composed by particularities producing its dynamic and the representation we make of it due to our senses and memory is organised the same way: structures linking and organising identities.

Fig 2. In our memory, identifications produced and their spatio-temporal organisation are linked as well. This schema is the spiritual representation of figure 1. France is linked to Lyon which is linked to field and sky. Those identities defines a location. The 13th of june at 14h01-14h02 a Butterly appeared. The “butterly” identity is supported by the structure containing its spatio-temporal information.


In our material environment, the existence of an identity is testify by its effect on other subject. It is an existence ruled by energy. In this environment ruled by energy, every of its particularities has its own weight on the system, depending on factors like mass, speed and others given by the scale of analysis.

In our own representation of this environment, identities and structures have various degree of importance. The way their importance is define and its effect on us are developed on the second degree of memology below.

Second Degree

1) identity and structure

Identities are linked following a spatial and temporal organisation. However they are also link by their particularities, by the similiarities between their definitions as an identity.

Particularities are linked in their environment by a spatial link, by proximity. Our senses and brain by analysing our environment create its representation. This representation is then stocked in our memory and, in our memory those identities are also linked spatially.

Identifications of those identities linked by a spatial link aren’t done at the same time (need attention) and because those identities are at this place at this moment, they are also linked by a temporal link (an identification after another). Representations our brain does of those subjects of identifications and our memory store are also linked by a temporal link.

From this point two spatio-temporal definition are already differentiable. The spiritual one create from information coming from the material world and alterable by concentration. And the material one defining our environment.

This spatio-temporal connection evolve in time and space because we are living, producing action implying reaction and because our environment has its own dynamic. The record by our brain of this spatio-temporal connection evolving in time is the record of action.

To resume, things from our environment are linked by a spatio-temporal connection and the representation we make of our environment follow the same rule. Our memory store identities and the spatio-temporal link, the action connecting them.

What is our environment?

Our environment isn’t only the nature surrounding us, our environment is all the material support our mind can visualize or feel. It goes from ourself to everything surrounding us. Depending on which scale we use to define it, our environment complexity is very variable.

2) Identities definition


a) identity

An identity is a specification of our environment.
Identities are production of what our senses can sense and what our memory can register from it. Those are created by attention. Identities can also be produce by our imagination. Those are created by concentration.

Subjects of identification in our environment are generally things supplying many particularities. One subject of identification for a proper defintion needs many identification from differents views, at differents scales and therefors need the application of an action (structure) to change from a view or a scale to another. For the creation of a proper identity, many identities and structure must be created.
Example: A table propping a lemon

Fig 3. A table propping a lemon.

The identities are the table and the lemon, the action linking them is double, firstly it is that the lemon is on the table and the table support the lemon. Secondly it is our condition in the production of the action of analyse. The global body condition and among others, looking at the lemon and then lower the eye for example to look at the table.

If we put our attention on the lemon, therefore creating some structure (action of putting attention), we will see further detail like black spot, irregularity, rotten, colors changes, etc… Only by putting our attention on the lemon surface we can already create lots of identities and structure (attention toward the lemon but also head movements etc… to be able to see the lemon with different point of view). If we do another type of action like for example touching it, we will put touch identities (flat, irregular, etc…). Another type of action could be to cut it, we would get more details of its constitution (liquid, seeds etc…). Then another type of action could be to taste it, this would add identities like sweet, salty etc..
Everytime we will add a new identity corresponding to details (color, acid, etc…) it will be link to the next one by structure. The structure link identities coming from differents scales, differents senses, differents points of views, etc… Details added to identities are generally not proper to only one identity, numerous others ones can be caracterized by this same particularity. In this case, this detail share by those identities is a link between them. This link constitute a second type of structure. The first one being every things linked by an action, spiritual or material. This one, the second one, doesn’t imply any action. The link is only the result of similarities in their particularities definition.

Fig 4. The action of analysis, the body condition corresponding (grey) as well as the spatial definition of the object analysed and its evolve in time ( green line) constitute the structure supporting the particularities oval and yellow. Those particularities being part of the lemon identity, they define it as the object analysed.
The more details and therefore structures and identities an identity support, the more it is “strong”. A strong identity is an identity that matter in our memory, it is often directly or/and indirectly stimulated due to its numerous connections with other identities. A strong identity can also be an isolate identity with a few or almost no connections but with a great specificity.

b) Symbol

A symbol is an identity supporting or letting place to numerous others identities and/or structures.
If it support numerous identities it is because it was a basic identity, without details, and because of structural development (due to various actions) numerous details came sticking it. Details can come from spatio-temporals links or identities ones.
A symbol supporting numerous identities can and generally is an identity supported by others symbols.

Fig 5. Universe is a symbol supporting the “sun” identity. The sun is linked to universe, part of its definition. The sun is itself a symbol supporting the identities “yellow”, “warm”, “energy”, “plasma”, “god”, “planet”, “tan”. Yellow, warm and energy are identities particularities. God is a mental link with “sun”, it is a spiritual link. Planet and Sun are spatio-temproally linked in the material world (green line), they are at this place at this moment and are analyzable with a certain body disposition (grey line). Yellow is itslef a symbol supporting the identities “lemon”, “chick” and … “sun”.

However, there is two case to separate from those generals ones. For the case of a single action, a concentration or an attention focus on one and only one identity. For the concentration state, without any body activity differentiable, without exterior stimulation, without reception of signal by our senses which could result in the creation of structures and identities. The action is purely spiritual and the choice of the thought is to focus on only one identity, without taking any structure linked to it. In this case, it is possible that an identity become, by concentration strengthening, a symbol without being linked to numerous identities. Its strength would come from its own strength and the one structure revealing the concentration action, supporting it. This symbol strength will come from the time of concentration applicate to it. Same goes for the attention case, without the application of any concentration, not any thought create or identity stimulated. A will fully applied on the attention on one and only one identity. The symbol created would then be symbol of the time applicate to its creation. For those two case it is an application of will into one and only one task. However the body and our thought have their habits, those properties will be develop a bit further. However it is important to mention them as even in a state of full concentration or full attention we still receive signals and, identities and structures are developed and create aside of the one coming from will application. However, the strength of these structures and identities is so weak (as no will is applied into their creation/stimulation) that in front of an entirely focus will (on attention or concentration) we can consider them as non existing. Contrary to the others symbol mostly created by their links multiplicity, this one is created by its unique own strenght.

This property is an extrem of the definition, numerous symbol link to numerous identity also possessed a strength strengthen by time of attention or concentration.

Two types of symbol are until now differentiables, these create by the multiplicity of their links (identity link, spatio-temporal link) and these create by disproportionate strength applied at their single identity.

Action/Structure is also a subject of identification and can also become symbol by the way describe above. An identified action is the result of numerous repetitions of this action by various actors and/or differents times and/or differents spaces. It can also comes from the length of application of this single action. Actions linked to cultural or social but also natural body reaction (smile, laugh, cry, etc…) generally are identified actions. An action repeated many time become an habits. Habits generally induce strong identities linked as they imply their stimulations. However this isn’t a general rule as an action can be done by numerous differents actors and on various subjects of reactions.

Fig 6. a) Butterfly, crow, owl, magpie, bat, dove, eagle and mosquito, depending on the time, they all do a concatenation of actions implying wings movements in order to stay in the air. This concatenation of action is for the moment describe by a concatenation of other identities and structures, it doesn’t have its own identity.
b) This action repeated by numerous actors in differents time and space definition get more and more strengthen and win its identity “fly”. This identity is the symbol representating the concatenation of the actions allowing those animals to stay in the air. Part of their definition, “fly” is linked to them by an identity link. However, as they aren’t all the time flying, it depends on their spatio-temporal definition. The fly identity is link to them by a spatio-temporal and an identity link coming from a certain type of signal. We could also add the two structures of the environment supporting the animal flying, as well as the action of analysis of the person watching the flight, but it isn’t the point here and the schema would only get more complicated.

Symbol is to identity what habit is to action.

The symbol explanation will be comlpleted part 6.

c) Reseved location

Identities access is made possible by their specifications or by going along the structure supplying them. Sometime, because of our knowledge, we got expactations, we believe that something still unknown, undefine could exist with certain specificities answering to our expactation. In other words, known identities specifications give us expactations on others posssibles identities. Thoses expactations, a type of thought process, of concentration application, will give place to structure development from already define identity giving this expactation, to, a new identity, the one expected. This new identity will not have the usual characteristic of an identity as it is an unknown identity, none of our senses identificated it and only our imagination give us some of its possibles specificities, parts of its defintion and coming from others identities. We will not have a proper vision of it, its defintion isn’t complete and need an identity defining it at its roots, an identity supporting those particularities. This unknown identity coming from expactation and support by a structure will be strengthened everytime the thought process of expactation will appear. Therefore, this unknown identity already symbol or strong identity as supporting specificities or letting place to numerous identities, could be of a great strength even without being define.

Fig 7. Someone thinks of something to eat. By thought he relies particularities answering to his envy and defining the searched identity. Identities defining this identity for now unknown are sweet, warm, uniform, apple, copious and soft. All those identities have a link with the unknown identity. The particularity cooked in oven imply an action and therefore is link to the unknown identity with an identity link and a spatio-temporal link. No identity seems to fit in all those details, the nearer one would be a cake but the particularities apple and uniform are contradictory. The presence of apple imply fragments and therefore a non uniform cake. The schema at the middle present a new particularity linked to an identity characterizing the unknown one. This particularity could have been added by concentration or attention. “zest” is linked to apple by n identity link but also a spatio-temporal link as its existence depend on an action (grating the apple). The fact that instead of an apple or even an apple cut in piece, the person could use apple zests reveals the unknown identity as an apple cake. The schema at the right represents the same situation as the first one but with the add of a particularity to the unknown identity. This particularity, the past, is linked to the unknown identity but also to the action of mixed. Its link with the identify action is double, in green line the spatio-temporal definition of the paste, it is here at this moment and in grey line the spatio-temporal definition of the person in capacity of mixing. This new particularity allow the combination of the two particularities, apple and uniform as in fact everything can be mixed. This new identity reveals the apple cake as the unknown identity.
In this type of situation, the expacted identity can be a new identity dicovered by attention, developed by concentration or it could also be an already known identity which was added details and therefore fit in (same goes for the other way, details are added to the unknown identity, those details linked it to a known identity). This new identity even if it just has been create, will straight ahead be of a great strength. It will inherited all the strength accumulate by the unknown identity reserving its location in the structure.

3) Space and time definition

Amongst spatio-temporal links we could differenciate links only spatial coming for example from general definition without variation in time. For example whatever the year, the time, etc… the sun will always be in the universe. However, norms we establish inherited their roots from logic inspired by facts allowing a definition valid up till now. For more rightness, no distinction will be done for spatial links. However the reason of their existence is explain below, part a).

We could also differenciate links only temporal, for exemple links created only by thought without taking its roots from a material reality. Those links are the ones created by imagination, however, afterwards they can be transposed into the material world, for example an inventor imagine an invention and then realize it or if an artist visualize a creation and then produce it materially. At contrario of the spatial links, the existence of those ones only comes from the supposed non variation of the space. By taking in count the fact that imagination is the product of our brain and that producing thought induce materials reactions in it, those temporal links are in fact spatio-temporal. This subject will be developed in the third degree of memology.

a) Space and time structural access

We access to our memory with identities particularities or by specification of structure.
Structure is specified by a spatio-temporal definition.

Our time definition can be divided in two main class. The first one is time definition of our surrounding environment, nature or other subject of analyse (identities) coming from our environment and giving us an idea of the time flux (ex: sun, day, night, season etc…).
The second one is our own representation of the first one.

To simplify further explanation we will call the first one objective time and the second one subjective time.
The more we define our objective time, the more our subjective time will be precise, the more we are able to access precisely to an epoch of our structure (therefore access faster to information).
Our objective time definition is mainly define by constant evenements, it can be a meal, it can be our work schedule or many different things ruling our quotidian. However, in most culture it is rules by date and time which are obviously also identities evolving in time (as it is their definitions). Our time is define by year, month, weak, day, hour, minute, second, etc…
Apart from year (and above like century, millenary etc…), others times definition are evolving and cyclic. Years and above are only evolving. For our subjective time, cyclic and evolving time aren’t a constant definition. Cyclic time can be seen as evolving time if we don’t know or don’t take in count the end of its evolution giving one cycle.

Fig 8. Schema of cyclic and evolving time. On the left an example of evolving time is shown, years evolving without known limits which could determinate a cycle. On the right, Monday, Tuesday, Wednesday are consecutive days evolving in the cycle of the week. If we don’t think of a week definition, Monday, Tuesday, Wednesday are only evolving, we don’t think that these day are part of a cycle ending Sunday and starting again with a new Monday annoucing the following week.

We don´t do all the time the whole time analysis of a situtation, most of the time we simply define it by an identity or a spatial and/or temporal definition (hour, minute, day and/or location). What is interesting with this observation is that two differents situtations on the objective time can have similar temporal defintion in our subjectif time. They are accessible with the same time definition on our memory. If these two situations don’t have any difference in their spatial definition or by identities they support, only the most recent one will be accessible. As a memory effect we lose our usual way to access to this information. The more we define our time the more we are able to access precisely to our structure whithout using any additive repair, that is to say spatial or identity ones.
We use different cyclics and evolving times.

Depending on which scale our evolving and cyclic time are define, our behaviour, our envy are affected.
For example, the less we define and are aware of the time evolution, the more situations we live will seem similar in our memory. They will be register with the same time definition, in this case, only creation of new identities or spatial definition will make a difference in our structure.
Same goes for our spatial definition, we got many different scale of definition of our environment. Going from the smaller scale visualizable (ex: micrometer, nanometer depending if we use tools etc…) to the biggest one (ex: light years etc…), our environment could be define in our structure as all the time spatially the same or completly different. The spatial definition is developed part 5, action.

b) Time disequilibrium between attention and concentration

The awarness of our subjective time evolution also depend on the situation, of our attention and the strength of identities and structures linked to the subject of attention.
This is due to the fact that some of our identities and structure are more define than other because we put in the past more attention into it. Because we spent more time on it while analysing, when we think about it, we also spend more time as there will be lots of subjects of analysis (more structures, more identities). Therefore, when we analyse a subject in our environment and it is link to another identity which was already a subject of attention, the time equilibrium of analysis coming from the body analysis (senses), and memory analysis will be modified. In this case, it will take more time for the memory analysis than the sensorial one.

Fig 9. First schema: the action of analysis composed by the body corresponding body condition (grey line) as well as the spatiale definition and its evolve in time (green line) constitute the structure supporting the particularities oval and yellow. Those particularities parts of the lemon identity define it as the object analysed. The second schema is constitute by a few more details coming from different location of the lemon, yellow at some place but green at some others, etc… The lemon and some particularities have an identity link but also a spatio-temporal one defining them as they are at this place and this moment. For the “spot” with the “black” particularity, some black spot, there is only an identity link between black and spot and therefore we can imagine a spot all in black. Same goees for the third schema with even more details, this time they come from various senses, not only sight. Touch (smooth) and taste (acid) join the sight to increase the lemon defintion.

The more the identity link to the subject of analysis is detailed, the more the memory analysis (confrontation knowledge/novelty) will take time. Same goes if our memory have numerous identities link with the subject of attention, it will take more time for the memory analysis.
However, if we analyse a subject of our environment which have no links with any of our identities stored in our memory, then we will put even more attention into it. Put more attention into it will allow either the dicovering of details corresponding to already stored identities or, to develop new identities (details) increasing the definition of this particular identity. In this case, the time of body analysis will be longer than the time of memoriel analysis.
As we define our subjectif time with date and time or details coming from our environment or from date and time, giving us an idea of the objective time, a situation with a lot of attention (body analysis) would give us a long time impression. A situation with a lot of concentration (memory analysis) would give us a short time impression.
If we use only attention, our time notion will be extensed, a short time will seem really long because the structures creates will be full of identities.
If we are only using concentration and don’t use any attention, our time notion is null, undefine as without any repair by time and date or identity giving us an idea of a temporal flux. The fact is that we will have some spatial, some temporal and some identity markers but they will come from our structures and identities taken or create during our concentration state. As time notion change depending on the strength of identities and structures taken or create, they don’t give any valuable temporal marker apart a chronologic order, this before this.

c) The concentration game

By thinking, spending some time on an identity, we can increase its strength, its matter. Same goes for structure and identified structure. By thinking we can also create link between differents identities, structures, modify an identity definition, in fact as it is our own representation, we are theorically able to do everything with it, we are the master of this environment. For some questions of confidence, knowledge and fear of unknown, this is definitely not the case. This will be explain a bit more in part 5, action, but the details about it will appear in memology degree 3.

Fig 10. The schema representating the lemon is the same as in figure 9. but with onle link added. This is the link between the identity yellow and the symbol color. The symbol “color” support “yellow” as well as all the other colors. By using concentration and focalisating on the lemon color we can access to the symbol “color” and the identities linked to it. By choosing the color red the picture appearing is a red lemon. The lemon identity has been modified as the color defining it is red. By the use of concentration we creat a red lemon.

Fig 11. This schema present the same process as the previous one, the use of concentration. In this case we use concentration to link two identities, “lemon” and “piano”. By creating this link we also create a link between their particularities. First of all those identities will be strengthen as the stimulation of one will lead to the stimulation of the others. And secondly this allow to create new identities. We could for example imagine a piano with the shape of a lemon or a lemon with string or an acid, oval and pulpy piano, etc…

4) Propriety of identity and structure connections

Identities and structure depending on their strength have more or less importance in our thought process.

a) Balance of time

As describe in the two previous parts, identities and structures are strengthened by time. They are strengthened by time but they are also weakened by it.
They are strengthened by the time of attention and the time of concentration but they are weakened by the time without stimulation, without being use.
An identity which was really strong in the past but hadn’t been use since a while can be weaker than an identity create or stimulate not long ago, even if this identity wasn’t strengthened during a long time of attention/concentration. However, its strength potential is still a lot bigger than the one of the recent identity. If for example the moment after, this strong identity which was put aside for some time, would be stimulate, it would be a lot stronger than the recent but without importance identity. However structures and identities don’t have an infinite life expectancy, their persistence is function of their links with others identities (and therefore of their possibility to be stimulated indirectly) as well as their strength.
Example: During our childhood most of us has a doudou. Very often at its contact, our senses had defined it and its memorial identity was quite rich in details (definition by sight, smell, touch and taste). Today our doudou, very important for us in the past isn’t accessible by memory. Details of a piece of plastic we thrown 5 minutes ago are easier to remember than details of our beloved doudou put aside for so many year. If comes the time when we find back this doudou, its details would come back as well as a part of its strength and it would directly take a lot more importance than the piece of plastic. The stimulation of this identity of the past would also stimulate the identities and structures linked to it and could revive others souvenirs.

b) A path made of will

Above we describe the fact that many structures and identities are linked. The process of thought can be visualize as a flux, a stream. This stream need some strength to continue its way. The strength inducing this current is our attention/concentration, however the strength possessed by identities can maintain this current and give it new impulsions.

Fig 12. Connections between various identities. This schema represent the brain schematic structure. It is obvious that the brain connexion are of in countless number. Imagine that every day we discover new things (consciously or incounsciously) and that all these identities and structures are linked together since the beginning of our existence.
The line thickness representative of an identity (rectangles) is representative of its strength. For example the identity on the upper right, A, surrounded by a tick line is a strong identity, un symbol. However, the other strong identities can be strong only by their novelty in the sytem or their recent stimulation. They still contain rests from current coming from previous passage and giving them a strength allowing them to compete with weak symbol or identity strengthened by numerous details. For example , B, could be a piece of plastique without interest you thrown 2 minutes ago and E could be a your favorite cup of coffe you broke one year ago. Despite the importance of E, B is at this instant more important in your thought.
The tickness of the line representating the structure linking identities is also representative of its strength. Here the different structures (spatio-temporal one or indentity one) aren’t differenciated. They all have the same color and strength, apart from the one at the upper left, a structure linking a strong identity to 4 weak ones. This structure represent an action supporting identities. This action could be spiritual as for example a thought process or material. Bearing an identity, X, we can deduce that this strong structure has been repeated numerous times and therefore probably constitute an habits. We can also deduce from its links identities that this action is more likely to be often realize by the same actor (D) as it is a strong identity, but also that its subjects of reaction are very variable as they don’t have strong identities (and therefore this structure wasn’t all the time applied to them). Weak identities don’t have any symbol defining them, letters are only for the strong ones, they have their own defintion. Same goes for structures, only the strong one is identified, its definition being supported by the symbol X.

Identities and structures are used, stimulated by differents types of situations.
The first one take place when we create it or when we stimulate it by the use of concentration or attention. For these two cases it is direct stimulation, voluntary ones.

Fig 13. In this case, despite the numerous path possibilities, only the one containing identities and structures concatenating the primary idea of research is taken. There is only one path, the thought is bright. The others stimulations, the involuntary ones aren’t representate and are in the background of the thought as they don’t have enough weight to compete with identities and structures stimulated willingly by the application of a strong concentration. Despite the brithgness of the thought, it isn’t sure that it will conclude the research successfully. The application of concentration allow a targeted search without change of subject. The thought process will be concluding if the thinked possess the necessary identities and structures.

The second situation is an indirect stimulation, an involuntary one. If the thought process encounter strong identities or symbol creating new impulsion initiating new thought. Involuntary if the thought process encounter a strong identitie or a symbol creating a new impulsion initiating a new thought. The encountering of a strong structure can also force the thought to go on a different path and therefore initiate new stimulations. But also involuntary for the case of a stimulation caused by a body condition. If a body condition is linked to an identity, being in this body condition would stimulate this identity which could be a the initiation of a new thought, this case will be developed in part 6, feelings, emotions.


Fig 14. Here the ideal path related to the idea is taken (same as the previous schema). The thought process follow its path. However, at every encountering of a strong identity, of a symbol or a strong structure, parallel paths are taken. The strength of symbols and strong identities give new current impulsions. Strong structures force new path and stimulate new identities giving new impulsion as well. Those current impulsion taking place at the same time as the application of a weak will, can have a competitive strength. The strongest stimulation being the one at the thought foreground, impulsion coming an involuntary process can take the first stage instead of the voluntary thought (same goes for a strong will, if the impulsion given by the involuntary process is stronger it take the foreground anyway). As in this case will is applied in the search of a specific path, these paths created by these current impulsion will not take the first stage of the thought. They will be disruptive elements for the voluntary thought process. Once the impulsion given and a bit of path done, this disruptive thought will vanish (lose its strength) and let free of disruption the vouluntary thought process.
On this schema, the thought process face the strongest symbol, A, which give a strong impulsion giving current to all the linked identities. At this moment, if only a bit of will is applied, the strength given by the symbol will be stronger and will initiate a new thought. However, in this exemple we choose a will strong enough to face this symbol impulsion. If we continue the floors, the current would go a bit further in the identities and structures linked to the symbol bu also in the ideal path. Then further, the ideal path woull be the only one executed (apart if it encounter a new symbol or an habits, etc…)

A thought process start from a direct stimulation, then, the others structures and identities connected will be in the stream way. The stimulation isn’t of everything at the same time, it goes from the closer structure/identity linked with the direct stimulation subject to the further ones. We can remember what was describe above, we access to our thought environment by space and time definition or particularities of identities, it is the same for the thought process.
The more similar their space and time definiton (or space or time) is to the direct stimulation, the closer their structure will be and the stronger they will be stimulated.
The more they are similar in their identities particularities to the direct stimulation the stronger they will be stimulated.

Our concentration is focus on this structure/identity for a reason, the more the stream will go on further linked structures and identities, the more it will vanish, unless:
-Some new informations (identities or structures) taken by the stream are supllying, are in good correspondance with the subject of attention/concentration.
-Some rests of previous stream in identities or structures (in the process of dissapearing) taken now by this stream give it a second flow. If that is the case, the goal of the previous thought giving strength to this stream might be modified because this will be a new impulsion, a new departure. The new goal of the emerging thought process will be a mix between the previous one and the new source of impulsion.

The vanishing of our concentration is due to the fact that the application of concentration need application of will. The will comes from the confidence and the confidence comes from awareness, knowledge (which doesn’t mean that knowledge imply confidence, it can on the contrary inspired mefiance and fear). In this type of situation, the more the path taken by the stream makes sense, the more our knowledge will be of use, testify, the more we will have confidence in this thought process and the more we will be able to put will into it. If the path doesn’t make sense compared to the primary goal, the thought will not be increased by current during its advance in the structure. Every strong identities and symbol giving a new contradictory impulsion (or strong structure giving another direction), will make it vanish at the advantage of a new dominating thought process. We lose our confidence in this path and the capacity to apply it our concentration.However, if for example the primary goal of the thought is to make a search without sense, say differently, to travel without goal in the structure, then this thought will not vanish if it doesn’t have sense…

If not any of the linked identities or structure contains informations interesting to the original subject of concentration, three thoughts’ processes are possible:

-The first one is to cancel the current stream path, go back to its direct stimulation or other point taken by the stream. Then return to a crossway where a path had been taken instead of another because it seemed to have more correlation with the first subject of attention or simply because a path had to be chosen to continue to advance in the reasoning.
-The second one is to skip this direct stimulation subject, to forgot or put aside the first idea and to start another one more or less different. Either by changing subject of attention or changing subject of concentration.
-The third one is to continue the current path even if it will probably not add any new information to the direct subject of stimulation. We continue to put our concentration on this stream and either further we will find back a link with our first subject of direct stimulation, or we will have gone so far in new structure and identities that it can be seen as a new departure, a new direct stimulation. This would be a progressive change of idea and will bring another subject of reflexion.

The presentation of these differents possibilities is interesting but in fact, what is a path having sense?

We should first remember that we make our own representation of the surrounding world. Every information we receive from it are organised following the example of our environment. Some identities are linked by their particularities, some structures are linked by their similarities… These links coming from informations we receive build our notion of normality. All these structures and identities make senses, the sense given by their existence in the world surrounding us, by their identity. However all these informations constitute the environment of our thought, and every thought process make use of these informations. Using the action of concentration we have the capacity to modify this environment, to create links, modify some identity, etc… In addition to this, informations use in a current thought process get linked to informations captured automatically by our body. Same goes for symbols and identities and thought habits which links to informations captured by attention. For these reasons, the idea we have of normality is in fact not based only on the information and its structure given by our material environment but on everything constituing our spiritual environment. Because we strengthen structures, a structure which didn’t have sense in the past can make sense later. An identity which hasn’t its place in a structure can later have its place, etc… The action of defining structures and identifying them allow to take paths which have sense as they are themselves an identity, they are define. As a result, a thought process having sense is simply a thought process which can be define. If its nonsense is define then it will have sense, the sense of its nonsense.
A way without sense can for example be a dream… Yet the fact that they are supported by the identity “dream” supporting these visualisations, gives it all its sense. The sense of a dream. However dreams have a lot more sense than what we could deduce from these vagues visualizations we sometimes manage to remember. Above we have seen case of will application, what is happening when it isn’t the case?

c) The dream path

Even when we don’t use concentration, we still have instinctive thought or dream.
Those visualisations of the mind are taking roots from material or spiritual sources. They are coming from rests of the stream or from stimulation create by body conditions. After the stream’s passage, identities and structures stimulated still have rests of stream, this rest disappear with a speed related to the previous strength of the stream (related to the state of concentration/attention)and to the strength of the stimulated identities and structures (the more it has strength the more it store stream). More strength imply more time for rest of the stream to disappear from identities and structure. As stream’s rests disappear progressively, the more recent the stream of thought fulfill a structure or an identity the more it will be full of rest.
When we aren’t conscious (concentrate or attentive) these rests are the strongest stimulations present in our brain, therefore, they are in the foreground of our visualisation, instinctives thought, dream. During this unconscious state, our rests of will stores in recently stimulated or strong identities and structure make their way through structures and identities linked to them. During those kind of thought process, because no will is applied, and because the stream’s rests comes from every structures and identities stimulated, the subject of this thought process will not always be “I”, it can be the subject of other action supplying other identities. Also the definition of the spatio-temporal flux will not make sense because it will come from differents structures create in differents definition of space and time.
A symbol or an habits giving place to an impulsion so strong that the visualisation is similar to a voluntary thought, can induce consciousness and therefore the awakening. This obviously depend on the state of body fatigue, of the strength of the symbol or the habit, etc…

Fig 15. Here the path only have the sense given the strength of identities and structures constituing its environment. It is discontinuous, of variable subjects, of various time and space definition, etc…

For the case of the body condition, without even the use of will and attention, they can induce the stimulation of identities and structures. Identities in the past directly linked to this body condition or, indirectly if for exemple a symbol is linked to an identity linked to this body condition. Body condition, in this state of unconsciousness will induce the stimulation of linked identities. Identity of the “I” as directly linked to the body but also all the other directly or indirectly linked. The stimulation of the “I” identity, symbol full of strength can lead to a state of consciousness and therefore an awakening or at least some more or less voluntary thought (as in the example of a weak will applied to a thought process fig 14). If the body only give a few weak stimulations, or strong stimulations but without links with strongs identities, the “I” and its identities and structures linked will mix to rest of stream stream, of various strengths, becoming material for impulsive thoughts, dreams.

Fig 16. On the upper schema, structures and identities constituing the spirit as well as the body containing it. The barrier between body and spirit is represented by dashed line, it is permissible. The upper schema doesn’t take in count body conditions or at least no body activity induce a stimulation of identity or structure.
On the lower schema, we take in count the body stimulation with as an example the stimulation 1 which is linked to the identity “P”. “P” is strengthened by this stimulation allowing it to compete with strong identities. The stimulation of this identity innduce the stimulation of linked structures and identities. If for example the stimulation 1 is a bladder stretches, the identity “P” would be “urine”, the “Y” structure would be “urinate”, the next identity would be … then the next structure, then etc… This stimulation will not be at the first stage of the dream if it is weak or that others impulsives thoughts in a process of stimulation are strong. However, if the stimulation gets stronger, by repetition or by a stronger signal send (bladder more stretches), the symbol “P” will be more strongly stimulated and it could take the first stage of the visualisation. Then if the visualisation continue and for example we visualize ourself urinate, this time the stimulation could be on the other way. We visualize ourself urinating and the corresponding body condition is stimulated.

5) Action, actor

a) Actor, identity or symbole?

Structure is the defintion of action, action needs actors. Actors’ actions lay in structure, every structure have its own subject of action. This subject of action, the actor, is define as an identity. Every structures has at its roots a more or less define identity. However, identified structure, habits, that is to say structure testify by numerous actor or action repetition can be differenciate and accessible without any identity basis.
Actors, identity supplying action are in number in our memory. Their types, “I”, “you”, “it”, “them”, etc… is also of a wide diversity.
Actor is the identity supporting action and, identity are definition of environment particularities. As evoked in part 2, identities definitions need many differents types of analysis, differents scales of observations to have a proper definition. An identity, basis of an action has to have a precise defintion to allow to understand which of its acting tools permit this action. An well defined identity is composed of numerous identites. Therefore, an identity creating an action is also constitute by numerous identities. Which of those precises identities is the real actor of this action?
The way our memory work, only an identity is needed to supply an action, even if this identity is an unknown actor. This property favor the creation of symbole, identity suppying or letting place to many idenities.

Fig 17. The unknown identity produce the action “X” on the actor “A”. The reaction of A receiving the action X is X’, this reaction modify A idenity into A’. For example A’ could be a person with a bump on the head. A this same person but without the bump on the head. X a stone’s throw and X’ is the action of receiving the stone. An unknown actor throw a stone on A which receive it on the head making him a bump. A’ will then produce the action Y, search the unknown actor. For this action he will use the actor’s particularities deductibles by its action: enough strength to launch a stone. Capacity to throw. Envy/reason to throw. Stone at disposition. Capacity to target, etc… All these particularities are shared by numerous actors, human or even animal, of different ages, different types, etc… The identity “unknow identity” of this mysterious actor support all these possibilities as well as its potential actors.

b) Identify actor, effect on structure

As describe in part 2, a structure can have its own autonomy by being identificate. An identified structure doesn’t need any identity at its basis. Identitied structures as well as identities are potential tools for a thought process. Potential tools for developing structure by concentration (actor “I”) linking identities and identified structures. The most define an identity is, the more precise we will be able to link fitting identities, produce interesting links, links having sense and increasing our knowledge. If this link didn’t have sense we generally wouldn’t use this new built structure and we would lose its track after a certain time without accessing to it.

Fig 18. a) An unknown actor use the sight to see the things surrounding him. Without definition of himself, without knowledge of its possibilities he can’t know which action he could execut nor the fact that he can actually produce an action and even less what to do of the objects he sees. The particularities he can identify instinctivly with its sight gives him the space organisation of what surround him, this object at this place, etc… The structure created in his brain record those space and time definition as well as its actor’s one, the unknown actor. b) the unknown actor identitfy himself as a human with a hand (!), legs, arm and a mouth parts of his identity. Those tools all allow different kind of action that he that he testify by producing different movements (catch, grip, turn, chew, stand, throw, etc…). c) Knowing his possibilities, this human manage to act effectively on his environment.

A good defintion of an identity is essential for a productive creation. As identified structures involved many identities, all the one participating to action and the one producing it, proper identification of structure’s actor and subject of reaction is needed. A good identification of actor and subject of reaction need analysis from differents scales, differents points of views, using attention, creating new identities or using existing ones. Every actor have an environment of action, what about our environment?

c) “I”

By defining the “I, “defining our identity, we are able to understand more our possibility as an actor, actions we produce, reactions they create. By realising that, we can link our identified structure of the “I” to other identities, increasing our knowledge of ourself and of our environment. The “I” identitfied structure supporting its action as well as its particularities has, as every particularities from our environment store in our memory, a spiritual and a material definition which tend to mix. The material definition comes from what we can distinguish of ourself by using our senses as well as actions we produce on the surrounding material world but also the materials reactions we produce in front of its own dynamics. Our spiritual definition comes from what we are able to distinguish of our spiritual environment, the structures and identities constituing it.
These two identities are generally mixed, mingled because as describe previously, we have the capcaity to modify by will our structures and identities using concentration (and it gets modify by itslef due to our habits and impulsive thought). In addition to this, depending on our spiritual state, our perception of our environment and in the same time our material defintion is variable. Same goes on the opposite way, our body condition affects our mental.
The “I” is the identity at the roots of our action, its structure, we should not forget is the record of spatio-temporal definition supporting identities. The time defintion we already talked about it in the third part but we didn’t really developed the space defintion. The space defintion of an action depend on its scale of observation. As well as the precision of the actors and reactors space of action definition.
A first “I” scale of identification, a basic one, would be the “unknown identity” creating action inducing a reaction. For this basic identification, the actor is only defined by the reaction it produce in its surrounding environment. The actor as an entity exchanging with its surrounding world and is define only by the action it have on it. This entity, “I”, is and we all know it a bit more complicate than this. An identification a bit more precise of the “I” could be done with a bit of differentiation in the actor identity. For example, an action produce by one of our arm could be differentiate from an action produce by the other arm or with one our leg. Others parts of our body in direct action with our environment could also be differenciate, like for exemple our feet, our hands, etc… Then all the already existing defintion could be define a bit more, add more details, with for exemple the differents parts of the leg, differents fingers, etc… Those details are actors composing the identity of the “I” which by the way is obviously a symbol as it let place and supply many identities. With those actors’ details and later the identified structures produce by, numerous links can be created with numerous identities, numerous field of actions can be developed, developing our knowledge and the knowledge of our possibilities. Even more defined, the “I” could be composed by muscles, articulations, bones, breath, heart beat, etc… Defining ourself even more as an actor, an actor acting on a material world…
A further identification of the “I” would be to take in count the fact that we are able of all these actions because we think, we got a memory allowing us to store all those identities constituting the “I” but also that almost all the informations we receive from our environemt are sent by receptors composing our body. Almost because some actions which aren’t capturable by our senses due to their signals’ specifications can also affect our body. Conscious or not of this modification, the new body condition can induce stimulation of linked identities. This other type of sensation will be developed in the third degree of memology. With a more precise definition of our being, our senses could be differenciated, we could take in count the fact that they produce differents kinds of identities. All those differents identities as well as structures supporting them can give us more understanding of ourself, our environment and our possibilities as an actor. By this identification of ourself we already have access to some objectivity.
The previous identifications of the “I” allow to take in count an actor when it produce a material action. In fact, even when we don’t produce any material action, for example the actions of analysing, of recording, of thinking. Structures which could be idealise as separated from “I” because we didn’t consider ourself as an actor, would in fact include our senses and memory analysis in the recording of the action. We were present as an actor because we get registering of this action. By realising that, we can understand and take in count the fact that the action we record is recorded in a specific way including our own action.
Another identification of the “I” would be to take in count the fact that our capacity of action can be apply in our surrounding material world but also in our own representation of it build and store in our memory, our spiritual world. We can also take in count the fact that the spiritual world, as it is our own “home made” world is a world where every actions are possible. As an actor creating this world and an actor made by it, we have on it every possibilities. It sounds nice but of course for that we have to face numerous difficulties. The first one being to keep the differentiation of structures and identities coming from the material world and the ones coming from the spiritual one. The second one is to keep the notion of the differents subjects supplying the differents structures including the differentiation of the “I” structure.

5) Feelings, Emotions

a) Emotion

In the previous part we talked about the fact that our body send informations to our brain giving place to structures and identities of various strength, various matter. We defined a bit the link between body and memory but what about the opposite, memory affecting the body?
If we think of an identity, depending on its strength more or less stream will start from it and will go through the linked structures, in this case we consider that this identity is the beginning of a new thought process. Depending on the actor at the roots of the structure, this thought will produce differents effects on our body .

If we were the actor of this action and the identity we think of is the subject of reaction, then this structure containing our spatio-temporal definition during the action will stimulate the same body condition as during this action. Say differently, while acting our body condition is registered in the structures and the access to this structure will stimulate the corresponding body condition (ex: heart beat, arms contracted, eyes open, mouth open, etc…). However, for the stimluation to result in a physical action depends on a few factors. Its execution depend on the strength of the stimulation, of the current state of attention or concentration as well as the state and positioning of the body.

If we weren’t the actor of this action, the structure stimulate will not find any correspondance with our body disposition and won’t stimulate it. However, if we weren’t the actor of this action but similarities are found between our body disposition and the actor’s one, then these similarities will give place to stimulation. Thoses similarities are define by our material world and as a result, they are subjectives. There is no rules, two identities completly differents can have similarities given by their spatio-temporal definition.

If we weren’t the actor of this action but, the identity stimulated is a really strong one, then, the stream coming from this identity will be of a great strength, it will go through many structures and identities without even the application of concentration. If some of the structures stimulated have similarities with our structure and so with our body condition, those corresponding body parts will be stimulated.

Fig 19. In a), the schema represent the body delimited by dashed line representating the permissibility of the information. Same goes for the spirit. inside the dashed framework representating the spirit we can find identities and structures linking them. In b), the same schema but showing a situation where the body receive information from the surrounding world. Our senses capture some signals resulting in new identities in our spirit. Those identities are all linked by structure. Four identities are created, they are the one which weren’t on the first schema. The others signals particularities coming from the surrounding environment having already been identified in the past, they are simply stimulated and win a few structural connections. Those identities are the one which were already in the first schema but linked with light blue in the second one. The lines colors representating the transmission of informations doesn’t matter in this example. All these informations define the subject of the analysis, here a robot. It isn’t representate in the schema to make it easily understandable but all the identities created or stimulated during this analysis are linked by structure and they are all linked to the symbol “robot” supporting them. In this example we could differenciate two different types of analysis. If someone receive the robot’s informations and linked them to its own body disposition, arm, head, etc… By thinking or seeing, the robot executing an action, for example upper the arm, the linked structure supported by the actor “I” would also be stimulated. However, if another person receive the same robot’s informations but without linking them to his body disposition, the sight or the thought of the robot uppering the arm would not stimulate the structure containing the action of uppering the arm.

Emotions depend on the degree of involvement with actions and subjects of identification of our environment. They also depend on identities and structures and the strength we put in them using concentration or the strength they receive by stimulation due to impulsive thoughts. Effects on the body coming from emotions are related to the strength of identities and structures triggering them in our memory. The felt we have of these emotions depend on our degree of attention and our body condition during the emotion. Because the strength of identities and structures depend on our own definition of the world, the relation material-spiritual and spiritual-material isn’t equitable. This non proportionnality produce extensions of body effects create by memorial stimulation. In other words, a weak identity which has been identified rapidly and has an imprecise definition, implying a weak link with body conditions could by the use of concentration or impulsive thought get a stronger spiritual definition. Get linked to other identities, others structures and therefore imply by its stimulation a stronger effect on the body than during its primary body analysis. These effects on the body affects the body condition and its capacity to capture information.
The process of capture and memorisation of informations takes time. Process of thought and visualisation of information also takes time.
Spiritually our thoughts as well as our impulsive thoughts given by symbols constantly stimulate body conditions. Voluntaries and impulsives thoughts give even more current for impulsive thoughts. For the case of a weak, partial or total break of thought to let place to attention, ongoing processes generate by current will mix with the subject of attention. The body captures informations, we receive them, but at the same time we link them unconsciously to symbols and ongoing impulsive thoughts. This link come from the similar temporal definition of these informations. They are stimulated at the same time. The link between these identities and structures connects spatio-temporals and identities definitions between them without even being conscious of it (our will being applied to another subject of attention).
Same goes for the opposite situation, our senses activation being a habit and having they own force of action, when we produce thoughts, stimulate willingly symbols, identities and structures we receive in the same time informations captured by our senses, without being conscious of it (our will being applied to another subject of concentration). These informations captured by our senses will stimulate identities and symbols linked but will also linked by structure to the ongoing thoughts. These two cases are extrem of the property, we can be half attentive half concentrate and link some informations more or less consciously.

Fig 20. a) The schema represents a person in a state of concentration, she still has impulsive thoughts but they are at the background of the thought. Fully concentrate this person doesn’t use any attention, however she still has her senses activate by habits. The schema is separated in two parts, on the left side conscious actions and on the right side unconscious actions. In the spirit box, on the conscious side, identities and structures are willingly stimulated producing a thought (rectangle in blue). On the unconscious side, senses activate by habits send signals, they create new identities (in pink) and stimulate already existing ones (in orange). Still unconsciously, two identities ans the structure linking them are stimulated by impulsive thought (in grey). Since then all these identities and structures are linked by structure, whether they come from conscious or unconscious action.
b) The shcema represent a person in a state of attention, she still has her senses activated by habits but informations they receive are at the background of the thought. Fully attentive this person doesn’t use any concentration but she still has impulsive thoughts. The schema is separated in two parts, on the left side, conscious actions and on the right side unconscious actions. In the spirit box, on the conscious side, two identities are created (in dark pink) and three are stimulated. On the unconscious side, two identities are created (light pink), one is stimulated (in orange) and two structures as well as the structure linking them are stimulate by impulsive thought (in grey). All these identities and structures are linked by structures wether they come from conscious or unconscious action.

The body constantly stimulate symbols and identities linked to its condition. Informations our senses can capture either by habits or by attention also do so. Our thought stimulate constantly body conditions linked to its symbols and identities. Impulsive thoughts do the same.
The more symbols we maintain are strong, the more they give impulsions and have effects on the structure, on our body condition. The more we are attentive, the more we create strong identities which will give strong impulsion and etc…
This constant go and back create by symbols strength is since the beginning of its existence, material and spiritual. It draws its strength and feeds in both.
For this reason emotions have extensive limits, they don’t correspond to a define number of symbols generating them or of body conditions expressing them. The origins of emotions comes from symbols, its expression comes from this constant go and go back between stimulations from the body to the spirit and from the spirit to the body.
The why of emotions as well as its various versions and its difference with instinct requires more defined notions and will be developed in the third degree of memology.

b) Senses differenciation

Up till now we defined senses identification as a whole, this isn’t the case. Our senses have differents degrees of importances, differents sensibilities. Some are more developed, some are completly forgotten, this depend on their sensibility but mainly on the definition we give to the signal they send to our memory giving birth to identities. If we differenciate our senses activity, their conditions can be defined. This can allow to understand more precisely our surrounding and body environment, field of expression of emotions.
In our current society, two senses are more than privileged, they are the one developed by and for social behavior. Sight and hearing are in an incomparable level of defintion compared to touch, smell and taste. If it isn’t obvious for you just think of how many visual or auditive identities (ex: word) you got and compare it to identities produced by your others senses.

However, many people develop numerous identification by these senses even if they keep a majority of identities coming from sight and hearing. Other people due to various environmental (body or surrounding) circumstance develop one or more of the three usually forgotten senses at the disadvantage of the two most common ones. We all develop cleverness using various identities and structures coming from differents senses.
Depending on which sense we use to identificate, the structure’s information will have differents body definitions of the actor . By accessing to an identity, the structure and then as explain above the correspondings body parts will be stimulated.

The more we use attention with numerous senses to define an identity the more its access by memory will affect our body globaly because it will be relate to more than one sense, to numerous identities and symbols, ans so to numerous body conditions.

Depending on which sense we use for an identification, the effect on our body will be different when the identity produce will be stimulated. However, as describe in a), emotion bounds are flexible, they can be extensed and go trough other identities and structures defined by other senses, inducing body stimulations which haven’t been directly linked to the identity source. The expansion of emotions bounds depend on various factors. For example, if an identity is define by a weak use of attention or concentration during its identifications (and therefore a weak structure), an emotion initiated by this identity will not go far in the structure unless if the path leads to rests coming from recent stimulations still present in weak identities and structures or if the identity is connected to strong identities or structures or if a body condition stimulate this weak identity.

Also, depending on which sense are commonly use by a person, his global way of receiving emotion will affect him differently. For example people with a weak touch sensibility or weak definition of touch identities are the one susceptible to feel the less as the skin is the largest organ of the body.

People who don’t define identities coming from informations given by some of their senses, receive these informations without putting their attention into it and their expression by impulsive thought give birth to intuition. Everybody can try to feel by using differents senses to discover more possibilities, multiply their identities and structures, their definition as an actor. The use of sense is an action, therefore it has the same property as this one. The more we repeat their utilisations, the more we are use to it. Their activation can become an habits (if it isn’t already the case), then they will win their autonomy and will be activate without the use of attention. As describe above, a structure or an identity can be strenghtened by concentration. Using concentration and projecting ourself mentally in a situation to conduct an action reinforces it and can increase its strenght uptill habits. For the case of spiritual action, thought process, this process is perfectly effective. However, visualizing an action requiring a specific body condition will not necessarily give the possibility to accomplish it. For example, this is not because we visualize really strongly and often ourself flying with a great technic inducing specifics arms’ movements that the application of this visualisation will be conclusive…! A good knowledge of ourself and our identity is essential for productives projections.

c) Projection

Voluntary or involuntary projections implying us as an actor acting in an environment of structures and identities are thought process. A voluntary projection is an application of will to identities and, creation or borrowing of structure answering to an envy, a desire, a need. An involuntary projection comes from identities or symbols giving impulsions taking structures linked to body conditions. Thought processes reinforces identities and structures stimulated. As seen in part a), reinforcement of these identities and structures modify, increase their matter in our memory, in our identity.

We can also reconstitute or create situation by projection by taking identities from other structures, identities from other senses or actors, the act of producing this thought is then enough to include the “I” to this situation. This property make the differenciation between real souvenir and build souvenir sometime confuse.

7) A design made by word

Memology degree 2 is only an overview of our memory properties. Therefore, word utilisation should also be describe but, in this degree, only the memory use of words will be describe. Language, communication, social etc… will appear in the third level of memology.
A word is an identity, it has an auditive definition as well as a visual definition (combination of letters). Those two defintion are only the specification of this word, this identity, its sense comes from the identity (or identified structures) it supply. The purpose of a word is to define, illustrate an already existing identity, auditive identity, smell identity, taste identity, visual identity, touch identity, identified structures, unknown identity, etc… well all type of identities describe until now are subject to word defintion. A word is the symbole, it let place or support numerous identities. These identities all share the specificities caracterise by the word, but they can also have others specificities and various spatio-temporals definitions. The word can also have differents meaning depending on the spatio-temporal definition supporting it (the structure supporting it).
Identity are only access by identities specification or spactio-temporal context. A word is a specification supplying an identity.
A word give access to many identities, an association of word give access to identity details. identity details contain structures and identities which are probably also define by some words. Words association permit to move along the structure going from identity to identity, structure to structure etc…
We can probably affirm without much risk of being wrong that words had been developed to illustrate and share thought, and it do it perfectly. Words fit so well in our thought process that in fact it take the place of the identity it supply, still as a symbol supplying it but with so much sense that our thought is in fact mainly made of word. However, if we pay a specific attention/concentration to it and we will access to the details of this symbol and therefore here to identities and structures it support. Word are shortcut for the mind, the use of symbol coming from our social education

8) Why is memology interesting?

As describe in the introduction, its richness comes from its capacity of adaptation. It has been developed on the simple basis of our memory and thought properties. Resulting properties are therefore applicable to any thought process and memory use. As every of our science, everything we have developed is the produce of these ones, memology constitute the link to unificate them. For my case I will only link sciences which try to define the human being in a spiritual and a material way.
If you still aren’t convince of this tool, here is an example of the use you could make of it:

An unlimited access to creativity:
By structuring information we possess and we receive with the simple definition of their identities and structures supporting them we give ourself an access to every information constituting this definition. The symbol “identity” support every identities, particularities we possess. The symbol “structure” support every way of organising these identities. Since then we can access to a countless number of identities and structures by the simple access to the symbol supporting them. Taking in count the fact that everything we create is based on the simple association of structures and identities, we only have to pick an identity, then pick a structure, and by linking them see if the idea is productive, if it answer to our expactation. We can also use numerous identities with one structure or numerous structures with one identity or etc… Our capacity to be creative depending only on our capacity to access to our memory and maske use of it, memology allow us to overcome this difficulty.

If you still aren’t convince by memology, then wait for the third degree…




This website has been developped to share informations but mainly to allow the orphanage expansion.

I didn’t create any association, this project is just to give you an opportunity to help children in the needs.

By the way, I don’t win anything by creating and managing this project apart the satisfaction to do something good. Know that an amount ridiculous to you could make a lot of difference there.

Thanks in advance for participating! (either by sharing the project or giving a financial support!)

If you like this page or simply the orphanage project, you are more than welcome to participate!

Share This:

This is a unique website which will require a more modern browser to work!

Please upgrade today!